- The problem
- I wanted to test two hypotheses about how children learn to write: whether AI can coach in real time through repeated practice, and whether the model can help without ghostwriting.
- The constraint
- I deliberately set the product constraint that the model coaches but never ghostwrites: it can give feedback, hints, and scoring, but cannot write the answer for the child.
- What I did
- In 2025, I designed, built, and shipped WordGyms (wordgyms.com) solo and end to end: problem definition, UX, engineering, launch, and user acquisition. The stack includes Claude / OpenAI / Gemini APIs, prompt engineering and evaluation, MCP, agent workflows, Google OAuth, and Cloudflare.
- The key finding
- The hard part was not only model quality, but product economics: token cost affects margin, and bad output affects trust. AI lowered the cost of building, but it did not lower the cost of being wrong.
- The result
- WordGyms is live with real users. Standing on the API customer and developer side gave me a concrete view of what ecosystem partners need from a platform: docs, cost, model performance, integration experience, and commercial viability have to work together.